Coopetysm Party 6.4 – ‘Save the World Stand-Up’: What a Joke (?)

Fast & studious: from start-to-stage in a hundred hours [Thank you, Brad, Morry & fellow graduates.]
To view this debut, place https://youtu.be/Ry5oyyi8yzk in your browser [Warning: audience expletives.]

…

[Within the opening minutes of the 5 consecutive-night stand-up comedy course, it was ‘obvious’ the Citizens’ Dividend Organisation (CDO) founder was a natural …]

‘What motivated you to do this?’ the coordinators asked, going round the group.

“To save the world,” he replied to which everyone laughed.

…

October 26, 2025

Hello

It’s one thing to have the ‘Save the World’ solution; it’s another to get it discussed.

Despite pride in our [as yet, only quasi-] ‘liberal democracies’ & [pseudo-] ‘battle of ideas’ and an inner yearning for full-civilisation, an interstellar observer could perceive it as a case of:

I’ll do anything for my kids & country except mention ‘Coopetysm’.

However, that alien would be mistaken as it’s more likely due to Coopetysm’s novelty – i.e. we’re used to either ‘winner takes all’ polarisation or centrist lowest-common-denominator compromise yet Coopetysm transcends the Left/Right/Centre-paradigm.

Thus, this is a new discussion-catalysing attempt – ‘Save the World Stand-Up’: https://youtu.be/Ry5oyyi8yzk

Thank you.

Best regards

Paul Ross

Founder & CEO

The Citizens’ Dividend Organisation (CDO)

The ‘Save the World’ Formula

For humanity’s benefit, until it’s solved, every economist should start their day asking:

‘265 years since Industrial-Revolution-Manchester’s ‘National-Product-to-subsistence ratio’ was around 1.3, having gone from the shovel to AI, how can (Australia’s) ‘GDP-to-subsistence ratio’ be only 5 – i.e. GDP per capita is $100,000 and the subsistence-income is, at least, $20,000 per year?’

The world has 5 Big [SEE–in–G] Picture exponentiating outcome-problems:

  1. Socio-disempowerment
  2. Econo-inefficiency
  3. Enviro-international-invasiveness
  4. Enviro-natural-unsustainability
  5. Government-budget-pressure.

Yet, they’re simultaneously, promptly and blissfully solved via ‘Coopetysm’.

Specifically, the simple singular solution is ‘The USI-4-UMHoW Reform’, which involves substituting ‘The Universal Subsistence Income’ (USI) for both:

  1. Universal Minimum Hourly Wages (UMHoW)
  2. Income-Welfare (including, as well as direct-payments, subsidies (such as for childcare) & tax-breaks (such as for superannuation).

Regarding economists’ ‘start their day’ question, given we have 3 tools – i.e. Science, Human-Organisation & Technology (SHOT) – with S&T exponentiating, the efficiency detractor must be ‘Human-Organisation’.

The CDO hypothesis is: the predominant culprit is the social-disorganisation-infrastructure of The USI-absence & UMHoW/income-Welfare-presence with their direct and, particularly, indirect disaffects summing to include stagnant-productivity & ‘The Cost-of-Living Crisis’.

Lastly, this Reform potentially transcends Left/Right polarisation – i.e. it unifies us – because that polarisation is about prioritisation and, in this case, all 5 SEE–in–G priorities are simultaneously and comprehensively addressed such that we achieve ‘maximised universal-sustainable-stability-prosperity’.